Synergy Blog

From Roger Baron: 9th Circuit Holds Private Medicaid Insurer’s Reimbursement Claim in Not Permitted by Federal Statute

Reprinted with Permission from Roger Baron

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently handed down its decision in Parra v. PacifiCare of Arizona, No. 11-16069, holding that a private insurer operating as a Medicare Advantage Organization Plan is not permitted to bring an action in federal court seeking reimbursement for $136,630.90 from a tort settlement secured by survivors of the deceased in a wrongful death action.  The Court holds that the federal statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b)(3)(A), “was intended to allow private parties to vindicate wrongs occasioned by the failure of primary plans to make payments.”  This statute does not authorize a suit for reimbursement against its insured (or survivors) for reimbursement.

Please note that a contrary decision was recently rendered by the 3rd Circuit, with the U.S. Supreme Court denying cert in that case on Monday of this week.  This opinion distinguishes the contrary 3rd Circuit’s decision on the basis that the suit filed there dealt with a claim lodged directly against the tortfeasors.  In this case, the suit was brought against the survivors of the deceased insured, not against the tortfeasor.  Language from this opinion addressing the 3rd Circuit’s decision, found on the top of page 14 of the slip opinion, is set forth here:

In re Avandia Mktg., 685 F.3d at 356, held  that § 1395y(b)(3)(A) provided a MAO a private right of action against third-party tortfeasors for medical expenses advanced on behalf of plan participants. We need not resolve whether Avandia was decided correctly because it does not aid PacifiCare…  PacifiCare’s claim for relief is not against the insurer, or even against [the insured’s] estate for sums received from a primary plan for medical expenses, but rather against the Survivors and their claim to this disputed res. 

To view the 9th Circuit’s decision, click HERE

TESTIMONIALS

"Coincidentally, on the day of a recent Synergy Seminar on Medicare & ERISA lien resolution I received a letter on an ERISA lien. This letter followed much back and forth between myself and the recovery vendor for BCBS. Despite my efforts they were adamant there would be no (zero)(zilch)(nada) reduction and provided case law to support their position. I tried Synergy’s Lien Resolution Services since I had just heard their Director of Lien Resolution speak. Synergy got them to reduce their claim by a third in less than ten (10) days. The result was quick and the fee very reasonable. If you have a tough ERISA lien and your typical efforts don’t work, give Synergy a try."

Michael S. Smith, Esq.
Lesser, Lesser, Landy & Smith, PLLC

Synergy’s team makes it easy to deal with all of the issues we hate at the end of the case. Dealing with Medicare, ERISA liens, keeping eligibility intact for Medicaid and complicated planning for the client’s recovery. The experts we work with regularly at Synergy do a great job of making sure I am protected as are my clients.

J. Clancey Bounds
Bounds Law Group

WordPress Image Lightbox