Synergy Blog

From Roger Baron: AZ federal court refuses to freeze assets held by plan participants so as to support ERISA plan’s claim for equitable relief

Reprinted with permission from Roger Baron

The ERISA Plan in Blood Systems v. Roesler, No. CV-11-02133-PHX-ROS, (U.S.Dis. Az., 11/2/12) sought a TRO and Preliminary Injunction freezing assets held by plan participants and their attorneys.  This court previously granted summary judgment for the attorneys.  This decision denies the plan’s requested TRO and Preliminary Injunction sought against the plan participants.  The Court acknowledges that pursuant to Sereboff, Knudson and 9th Circuit law, the plan “must show the plan participant still possess[es] the funds.”  Nonetheless, the Court is not sympathetic to the plan’s claim that “failure to freeze assets” will likely undermine its ability to seek equitable relief.  As to the plan’s argument that “public interest in stable ERISA group health plans will be undermined,” the court states,

In light of the circumstances here, this public interest is not jeopardized. The public interest is not furthered by allowing plans to freeze a participant’s general assets without support the participant possesses the funds.

To view the court’s ruling, click HERE

 

TESTIMONIALS

“Synergy Lien Resolution Services just finished getting an ERISA lien dramatically reduced for me. I tried for months, asked for the plan etc., tried to understand it, to little avail. Synergy got it slashed way beyond what the carrier told me that they would ever agree to. It cost my client peanuts, benefited her huge. I won’t ever screw around with trying to get those reduced; from now on they all go to Synergy.”

Rick Kolodinsky
Rick Kolodinsky, P.A.

"I just wanted to say thanks to you and the entire Synergy Settlement Services team for helping us put together a series of structured settlements and special needs trusts in two complex cases involving significant recoveries. As always, your accessibility, guidance and expertise on a whole host of post-settlement issues is very much appreciated and valued, particularly with respect to the often confusing topic of Medicare set asides. I look forward to our continued collaboration on cases in the future and am very appreciate of the first rate service your company continues to provide to our clients."

Stephan Le Clainche
Formerly of Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche

WordPress Image Lightbox