Synergy Blog

From Roger Baron: Cert Denied in GSK v. Humana Case Involving Medicare Advantage Plan’s Recovery Rights

Reprinted with Permission from Roger Baron

Today the Supreme Court denied the Petition for Writ of Cert filed in response to the 3rd Circuit’s decision which permits private “Medicare Advantage” insurers to utilize the federal statute [Medicare Secondary Payer Act, 42 U.S.C. 1395y(b)(2)] to pursue a federal cause of action for subrogation.  The 3rd Circuit’s decision is not only problematic for insureds, it also permits subrogation recoveries to be channeled into the pockets of the private insurers, as well as Rawlings and the other subro collection agents.

To view the Petition which was denied click HERE.  Below is the message which Mr. Baron sent out about this case on December 7, 2012.

As most of you are aware, the 3rd Circuit recently decided that private insurers offering Medicare Advantage coverage were permitted to utilize the federal statute [Medicare Secondary Payer Act, 42 U.S.C. 1395y(b)(2)] to pursue a federal cause of action for subrogation.  This decision was a “first of its kind” and, in my opinion, somewhat outrageous because it permits the subrogation recoveries to be channeled into the pockets of the private insurers, as well as Rawlings and the other subro collection agents.

The 3rd Circuit’s ruling is now being challenged in the Supreme Court.  The attached Petition for Writ of Cert was filed two days ago.  The attorneys seeking cert are seeking amicus support.  It is probably too short of notice for any of us to muster up an amicus brief in support of this Petition.  But if, by chance, you know of an organization that would like to do so, that would be great.

TESTIMONIALS

"I have used Synergy to resolve tough Medicare lien and set aside issues. There is no other practice that comes close to the quality of their work. I highly recommend them and they are a must for the substantial, tough cases."

Mark R. Hanson
LaBovick Law Group

"In my twenty-two year career as a trial lawyer I've handled my share of catastrophic cases and structures, but imagine the complexity of an engaged, unwed mother catastrophically injured during delivery, giving birth to a healthy child, but left in a vegetative state? The issues of guardianship and entitlements of the newborn, the rights of the biological father-fiancé, an out-of-state teenage child of the mother, lifetime maintenance of the mother, as well as the rights of family of the mother, who became her primary care-takers? Synergy systematically managed the seven figure tender of one defendant, the establishment of a Qualified Settlement Fund, a Special Needs Trust, and multiple structures, all the while concurrently maintaining the various entitlements to ancillary services, as well as the remaining litigation. Everything was handled professionally, timely and literally without a hitch. Truly an amazing feat."

Marcus J. Michles II
Michles & Booth

WordPress Image Lightbox