Synergy Blog

From Roger Baron: Supreme Court grants Cert in Medicaid Case which Challenges the Application of Ahlborn’s “pro rata” loss sharing formula

Reprinted with Permission from Roger Baron

The Supreme Court granted Cert yesterday in E.M.A. ex rel. Plyler v. Cansler, 674 F.3d 290 (4th Cir.2012).  In this case, the 4th Circuit upheld the application of Ahlborn’s pro rata loss sharing formula for a Medicaid reimbursement claim.  The North Carolina Attorney General filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari which was granted in DELIA, SEC., NC DEPT. OF H&HS V. E. M. A., ET AL., — S.Ct. —-, 2012 WL 4343865 (Mem), U.S.,2012. September 25, 2012.

With the pendency of the McCutchen case and the granting of cert in this Medicaid case, it appears that the Supreme Court is interesting in examining the details of “reimbursement” claims.

The Questions presented in the Petition for Writ of Cert are as follows:

  1. The Medicaid Act requires participating States to seek reimbursement from third-party tortfeasors for health-care expenditures they made to Medicaid recipients who are tort victims. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396a(a)(25)1396k(a) (2006). To enforce that requirement when the recipient and a third-party resolve their tort dispute through judgment or settlement, North Carolina law provides that the State has a subrogation right to, and may assert a lien upon, the lesser of one-third of the recipient’s recovery or the State’s actual medical expenditures. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 108A-57 (2011).
  2. The question presented is whether N.C. Gen. Stat. § 108A-57 is preempted by the Medicaid Act’s anti-lien provision as it was construed in Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 268 (2006), an issue on which the North Carolina Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit are in conflict.

Ready to schedule a consultation?

The Synergy Settlements team will work diligently to ensure your case gets the attention it deserves. Contact one of our legal experts and get a professional review of your case today.

Request Consultation

TESTIMONIALS

"In my twenty-two year career as a trial lawyer I've handled my share of catastrophic cases and structures, but imagine the complexity of an engaged, unwed mother catastrophically injured during delivery, giving birth to a healthy child, but left in a vegetative state? The issues of guardianship and entitlements of the newborn, the rights of the biological father-fiancé, an out-of-state teenage child of the mother, lifetime maintenance of the mother, as well as the rights of family of the mother, who became her primary care-takers? Synergy systematically managed the seven figure tender of one defendant, the establishment of a Qualified Settlement Fund, a Special Needs Trust, and multiple structures, all the while concurrently maintaining the various entitlements to ancillary services, as well as the remaining litigation. Everything was handled professionally, timely and literally without a hitch. Truly an amazing feat."

Marcus J. Michles II
Michles & Booth

"I was smart enough to hire Synergy Lien Resolution Services. Kudos to Synergy for tracking down ALL the medical bills, hounded Medicaid to pay them all, got all providers to state zero balances and then negotiated Medicaid down to accept $30K [down from 200k] to wipe out all of the medical bills."

Marianne Howanitz, Esq
Marianne Howanitz Law Offices

WordPress Image Lightbox