Synergy Blog

Insurers Request for Plaintiff Social Security Number

CMS finds insurers requests for SSN’s appropriate for Section 111 MMSEA purposes:

In order for CMS to accurately coordinate payments made by Medicare to ensure appropriate payment, Medicare requires the HICN (Health Insurance Claim Number) or the SSN and the EIN (Employer Identification Number). Medicare has collected this information from beneficiaries since the inception of the Medicare program. This information is used for the administration of the Medicare program, the beneficiaries personal information is protected by the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule.

CMS’ clarification of the appropriateness of request/release of this information arises from overwhelming concerns of the plaintiff and plaintiff attorneys. What will the defense do with this information once it has been provided? Section 111 requires the SSN if the HICN is unavailable if the insurers are unable to report to the COBC (Coordination of Benefits Contractor). Could the “plaintiff” be found non compliant under Section 111 for not providing the requested information for accurate reporting of claims? This is yet to be determined.

As stated by CMS the, “collection of HICN’s, SSN’s, and EIN’s for purposes of compliance with the reporting requirements under Section 111 of Public Law 100-173 is appropriate.”

Lien Settlement Solutions can assist your firm in navigating MMSEA Guidelines and Medicare Compliance. For more information about Medicare Compliance and Lien Resolution, contact us at 1(877)907-5436 or


"I just want to thank Synergy for their great work in getting a health insurance lien resolved. The health insurance company refused to reduce their lien a penny from a motorcycle accident involving my client who was not wearing a helmet, a fact that would have hurt our award in front of a jury. Synergy put tremendous pressure on this company, and after months of bombarding this insurance company with statutory requests and threats, they were able to get them to give in and reduce the lien significantly. The cost was minimal in relation to the hard work they put in, and the savings my client received. Client was very happy, and it allowed me to close out a case that I had resolved over 6 months before. Keep them in mind if you are dealing with a smug insurance adjuster who felt confident he would not have to reduce a lien, like I was dealing with. Thank you very much Synergy."

Jeffrey A. Adelman, Esq.
Adelman & Adelman, P.A.

"In my business as a plaintiff’s products liability lawyer, everything begins and ends with our clients. In our firm we never handle a significant case without the assistance of Synergy. Why? Very simple: we trust Synergy with our clients. Yes, Synergy only works with plaintiffs. And yes, they are highly technically proficient and know this business cold. But what makes them different from others is that they listen to our clients, make our clients comfortable with complex issues, and always put the interests of the client first. In my opinion, because of their unique ability to handle people with sincerity and compassion in their time of crisis, they stand head and shoulders above his competition."

Richard Newsome
Newsome Law Firm, Past President of Florida Justice Association

WordPress Image Lightbox